Monday, June 20, 2011

nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and

images are nathan kress and jennette nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. McCurdy and Nathan Kress
  • McCurdy and Nathan Kress


  • gcformeornot
    12-31 01:54 PM
    please help




    wallpaper McCurdy and Nathan Kress nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. jennette mccurdy and nathan
  • jennette mccurdy and nathan


  • mattresscoil
    10-18 08:48 AM
    My 485 interview (employment based) has been scheduled in San Jose, CA for Oct,29th.
    Interview letter says bring following documents:

    All Passports, all documents that submitted during 485, current employment letter, W2s , marriage certificate, insurance policies, rental agreements etc�.

    I have few questions on this:

    1.My wife interview is at 7:45AM and mine is 8:15AM. Does it mean we have to go
    separate or can we go at the same time?
    2. Do I need to carry employer tax returns also?
    3. Do I need to carry affidavit of support for my wife?
    4. Are there any documents that I need to carry apart from mentioned in the above list?

    Also if you have attended interview in San Jose field office, please share your experience.

    Thanks.
    1.My wife interview is at 7:45AM and mine is 8:15AM. Does it mean we have to go separate or can we go at the same time? - Most likely the officer will call you together.

    2. Do I need to carry employer tax returns also? - No, just carry the letter of continued employment from your employer stating your income and that you work full time 40 hors a week form them.

    3. Do I need to carry affidavit of support for my wife? - Not require but carry notarized cope if you really want to.

    4. Are there any documents that I need to carry apart from mentioned in the above list? - Just carry every thing. Make sure you keep things sorted/organized so that you can pull whatever the officer wants from the stack.

    Good luck and let the group know what happens.
    Thanks, Mattresscoil!!




    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. jennette mccurdy and nathan
  • jennette mccurdy and nathan


  • deepimpact
    09-17 11:13 PM
    Spill over from FB should go to most retrogressed EB category regardless of the EB1,2,3,..

    In this case, if any spill over from FB should go to EB3-I. I dont know whether spill over will happen from FB or NOT.

    FB spillover from a year gets added to overall EB quota of 140K for next year. And each category gets its proportional share of the spillover.




    2011 jennette mccurdy and nathan nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. Lunch with jennette mccurdy
  • Lunch with jennette mccurdy


  • eagerr2i
    08-02 02:19 PM
    Seems like a convulated issue. You would be better advised by consulting an immigration lawyer asap. Check with your lawyer if you have one. Sheela Murthy, Rajiv Khanna, Sonal Verma or Shusterman are some of the popular names in immigration law. You could try to get a consulting appointment with one of them asap. Typically they will study the case & discuss the case with you and suggest options. Typical consulting fee varies from $200 to $ 400 for one session.



    more...

    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. is nathan kress and jennette
  • is nathan kress and jennette


  • anand3597
    12-13 05:56 PM
    Hello,

    We (my wife and I) got our CPO emails on Dec. 1st. In the US since 1997. Hopefully the details below will help you:

    1. Called Nebraska service center weekly for last ~2 months to check progress of I485
    2. EB3 (Aug. 19, 2004) to EB2 PD porting request sent in Mar. 2009
    3. Oct. 2009- was told that I485 review will need to wait till EB2 I140 approval notice is transferred from National visa center to Nebraska center.
    4. Nov. 2009- sent letters to senator and congressman requesting assitance.
    5. Nov. 20- soft LUD
    6. Dec. 1- text message and CPO emails
    7. Dec. 7- received green cards in mail

    I think the POJ calling method helped us the most in identifying why the PD porting request had not been approved and move the process ahead.


    regards,

    anand3597

    donated to IV




    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. Nathan Kress voiced the role
  • Nathan Kress voiced the role


  • nixstor
    09-18 10:54 AM
    I dont feel that its a cosmetic change, while I agree that it can lead to some confusion. But there are orgs which have done it succesfully in the past. I thought it might give a better chance for us to give every one an idea abt what we are doing without getting on here or not coming her on to the website thingking "yet another org working for illegals"

    I agree that the paperwork that needs to be done might be a lot. Our presence is predominantly on the website. I mean no offices etc.. Redirecting requests on the web aint a big deal. People who go to IV will be redirected to LIV. I am not trying to take over and drive in a new direction. As I said, this might not be the exact need of the hour with congress in session. Core members can discuss this when they feel its pertinent.



    more...

    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. kress and jennette mccurdy
  • kress and jennette mccurdy


  • kuhelica2000
    10-18 08:58 PM
    Did you have to change your address while you switched jo?. And if you had changed address, did you inform USCIS. I am trying to find out if address chnge is what triggers RFE for job switch. Also were you on H1B or using EAD with previous employer.

    I changed jobs early this year with a 20% pay cut and with different titles and with different client type (private vs public). Got GC last month. No RFEs. I did not inform USCIS.

    Before switching jobs, I checked with my attorney and made sure that I am covered, made sure that my previous employer will not revoke my approved I-140 and made sure that my current employer will cooperate with the process. Last month my GC got approved.

    Good luck.




    2010 jennette mccurdy and nathan nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. are nathan kress and jennette
  • are nathan kress and jennette


  • Catherine
    06-27 11:16 PM
    Thank you for the information, Tazike. I've heard many conflicting viewpoints on this but none that say you immediately lose your status - I will look into it.

    I can say, though, that I've traveled in and out of the US on my green card since the divorce became final, including telling an immigration official that I was now divorced on my most recent return, and yet I have still been allowed back in each time. Perhaps I have just been lucky. Also, I did mention on that last journey that I have a waiver application currently submitted.

    Fingers crossed...



    more...

    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. nathan kress and jennette
  • nathan kress and jennette


  • LondonTown
    07-30 10:35 AM
    No, VO returned my passport to me. They said will be sending a mail after review all those documents given by me.

    It took 5 weeks for me before I got the email.
    Update the thread for others reference when you get the email. Good luck..!




    hair Lunch with jennette mccurdy nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. nathan kress and jennette
  • nathan kress and jennette


  • lostinbeta
    10-14 02:17 AM
    You mean a paw print?



    more...

    nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. mccurdy and nathan kress
  • mccurdy and nathan kress


  • glamzon
    08-02 03:15 PM
    lol...nice joke ..can i borrow your pigeon for this weekend ..need to make some weekend deliveries ;)




    hot is nathan kress and jennette nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. jennette mccurdy and nathan
  • jennette mccurdy and nathan


  • rdehar
    07-20 12:26 PM
    Guys, I have been posting this message as a reply on a few threads, I just want to bump up to a separate thread.

    This should come as a reality check for all filers (PD 1995 or PD 2007), all victims of BEC, all guys who are getting married soon and chose not to file I-485, nurses, engineers, physicians and all those who are losing hair from hyper-tension:

    1. The BEC has vowed to clear all backlog by Sep '07 ( I myself got out of it just-in-time, in May '07, after spending 3 years );

    2. USCIS has already announced that this year's GC quota is finished, meaning there will be no more I-485s approvals before next year's quota starts (Oct '07);

    3. Filing I-485 does not equate to approval, USCIS cannot approve I-485 without forward movement of dates and filer's PD falling into that range. However, a I-485 application can be pre-adjudicated ( citation needed );

    4. Almost everyone who can apply for I-485, will apply. This means USCIS has all the data ( all the numbers ) to work with and make a very accurate forward movement of dates from now on. Thus far, they have been making random guesses ( because of labor substitution among other factors? );

    5. Once bitten twice shy, it is highly unlikely that USCIS will make dates 'C' ( for over-subscribed categories/countries EB2 and EB3 for China, India, Mexico and Philippines ) for next few years. They can, however, make forward movement in an orderly fashion. Remember: dates are already 'U' for everyone;

    6. Whenever USCIS moves dates forward, people who could not apply now will be eligible to apply I-485 and/or I-140. These include all people who are still stuck in BEC heck. Older PD always had golden value and will continue to have golden value;

    7. EAD and AP are, however, not dependent on PD. This intermittent relief is a blessing for people with recent PD, which pre-PERM filers never dreamed of;

    Please draw your own conclusion(s).



    By the way,

    *. RIP 'Labor Substitution'. Thank God it is gone. Good riddance. Rules of game just got a lot fairer !!



    more...

    house house nathan kress y jennette nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. Jennette McCurdy, Nathan Kress
  • Jennette McCurdy, Nathan Kress


  • andy garcia
    06-15 03:12 PM
    If its I-94# whatever is your latest number, from Actual I-94 card or I-94 attached with the latest H1 renewal/extention

    The A# is assigned the first time that you apply for I-485.
    It is not the number on I-94. That number is everytime they issue a new one when you enter the US.




    tattoo Nathan Kress voiced the role nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. -”iCarly” star Nathan Kress
  • -”iCarly” star Nathan Kress


  • diqingshen
    07-16 09:19 AM
    How can we make the scale lean towards our side?
    Phone campaign?



    more...

    pictures kress and jennette mccurdy nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. nathan kress and jennette
  • nathan kress and jennette


  • GCBy3000
    02-07 09:54 AM
    You are not married to your job if you are in H1. This is my whole point to be in H1. I MAY BE WRONG.

    If you are in H1 and having a PD of xxx date and if you decide to switch to another company by transferring your H1 into different position, you can still carry your PD with you for the new position eventhough it is totally different position. This is my understanding. If this is true, you can go up the ladder ifyou are in h1. If you invoke EAD and use 485, you cannot do this.

    Only other way to do this when you are in EAD is to switch back to H1. Again, you should have left some time in your original 6 years of H1 to do this.

    It is purely upto you to decide what do u want. If u r planning to stick with the same company that has your H1B, then no need to pursue EAD option. But if you are planning to get out of your current company and pursue different opportunity, then you can use ur EAD.

    No matter what the status(H1B or EAD) you are in, you need to be employed in the same position or a similar position as in your Labor Certification. If your Labor Certification says you are a Programmer you cant be a Project Mgr in EAD. Till you get your GC, you are compulsorily married to your profession and title.




    dresses jennette mccurdy and nathan nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. are nathan kress and jennette
  • are nathan kress and jennette


  • webm
    06-09 02:27 PM
    One of my friend with PD Jul 2001 EB3 India is still waiting for his GC. His name check was cleared 4-5 months back and not sure what he was waiting for.....

    I am on the same boat as your friend...Took infopass but its of no use..

    so waiting..continues..waiting for luck!!

    Looks like EB2 approvals spike going on this month..atleast something moving...


    --------------------------
    EB3-I Oct,2001 (TSC)
    FP/NC -- cleared
    485 RD -mid June 2007 (TSC)



    more...

    makeup nathan kress and jennette nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. house nathan kress y jennette
  • house nathan kress y jennette


  • gman
    07-29 02:55 PM
    What is your exact job description in labor? I had similar delimma and I took paid consultation and as per the lawyrer, This transition falls into the catagory of "Similar" job so no problem however the biggest IF is your job description in Labor.

    Are you looking for specific language? How was similar defined from your attorney?

    Job description in Paper posting / ( I don't have I-140 in front of me but i assume the same) is:

    SYSTEMS ANALYST

    JOB DESCRIPTION:

    Systems analysis in connection with development of technical and detailed design including application processes, interfaces and database design. Test, maintain, monitor, and program software applications.

    JOB REQUIREMENTS:

    1. Bachelor's degree in Computer Science.
    2. Education and/or experience must include Visual Basic, SQL, Relational Database, XML, and ASP.


    The new job is: Director of Software Development

    • Execute the company’s technology architecture and strategy.
    • Foster a strong work environment that rewards individual and team efforts and encourages creativity, while maintaining high caliber productivity.
    • Prepare detailed project development work plans for scheduled software product releases and ad hoc software development projects.
    • Oversee project schedules and supervise staff and consultants assigned to specific projects to ensure high quality results and timely completion of all projects within budgetary guidelines.
    • Support the division’s Product Definition group by participating in requirements planning, data modeling, and business process walk-throughs to ensure proper transition from business requirements to development of the required software components.
    • Provide leadership and management for a team of SW Engineers, QA Analysts, and additional technology professionals and consultants.
    • Implement solutions using modern methods in SOA, OOP/OOD, Enterprise level architecture, and familiarity with UML and Case tools.
    • Travel approximately 25% of the time to both in-country and international destinations.
    • Perform other duties as assigned by the VP of Software Development




    girlfriend -”iCarly” star Nathan Kress nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. nathan kress and jennette
  • nathan kress and jennette


  • optimystic
    04-23 03:46 PM
    What about EB1s? Were they also Unavailable in the interim July 2- July 17 blackout period?

    I believe so. As per the archived bulletins, (and also per my memory) , everything was 'U' in Employment based category.




    hairstyles mccurdy and nathan kress nathan kress and jennette mccurdy and. are nathan kress and jennette
  • are nathan kress and jennette


  • meridiani.planum
    06-15 02:07 PM
    hi,
    Can someone help me with the situation i'm in.
    I had H1B Visa validityfrom X company from 06/2004 - 12/2007.Applied for extension in June 2007. I had
    query on it and i got status update in Feb 2008,stating request for evidence(RFE) documents.
    X company send the documents but got denial on May 2 , 2008. I had 2 options at this point of time
    first one was make an appeal with right documents. second one was to leave the country in 30
    days which i has NOT choosen obviously.
    In the mean time, i have applied for H1-B Transfer with new company with premium processing. Also made appeal with old company (X) , I'm waiting for the decision of appeal. but now, i got
    APPROVAL on my H1-B Transfer with new company.
    I-94 that i have on my passport is with Old company(X) .

    Question is:
    I need to revalidate my visa that was expired in December 2007. I received my H1B extention last week
    when i met Immigration officer close to where i live. she said u r good to travel with new I#94 number (which is same as old one). but without visa how would it be possible.
    Do i really need stamping to go out of US to visit my native country?

    Pls advise. Any answers would be appreciated

    + you need a new visa stamp to re-enter the country. New approval notice alone is not enough.

    + did you get an I-94 with the new companys H1 approval notice? When you applied that H1, what did you specify as your old employer? company X or the company whose H1 was denied and is now under appeal? Because that makes the intermediate H1 a 'bridge' petition, and opens up potentical complications.... read the following:
    http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5176
    http://www.murthy.com/chatlogs/ch021808_P.html




    mheggade
    07-20 01:13 PM
    RIP 'Labor Substitution' is the best thing happened ever happened so far!!!


    Guys, I have been posting this message as a reply on a few threads, I just want to bump up to a separate thread.

    This should come as a reality check for all filers (PD 1995 or PD 2007), all victims of BEC, all guys who are getting married soon and chose not to file I-485, nurses, engineers, physicians and all those who are losing hair from hyper-tension:

    1. The BEC has vowed to clear all backlog by Sep '07 ( I myself got out of it just-in-time, in May '07, after spending 3 years );

    2. USCIS has already announced that this year's GC quota is finished, meaning there will be no more I-485s approvals before next year's quota starts (Oct '07);

    3. Filing I-485 does not equate to approval, USCIS cannot approve I-485 without forward movement of dates and filer's PD falling into that range. However, a I-485 application can be pre-adjudicated ( citation needed );

    4. Almost everyone who can apply for I-485, will apply. This means USCIS has all the data ( all the numbers ) to work with and make a very accurate forward movement of dates from now on. Thus far, they have been making random guesses ( because of labor substitution among other factors? );

    5. Once bitten twice shy, it is highly unlikely that USCIS will make dates 'C' ( for over-subscribed categories/countries EB2 and EB3 for China, India, Mexico and Philippines ) for next few years. They can, however, make forward movement in an orderly fashion. Remember: dates are already 'U' for everyone;

    6. Whenever USCIS moves dates forward, people who could not apply now will be eligible to apply I-485 and/or I-140. These include all people who are still stuck in BEC heck. Older PD always had golden value and will continue to have golden value;

    7. EAD and AP are, however, not dependent on PD. This intermittent relief is a blessing for people with recent PD, which pre-PERM filers never dreamed of;

    Please draw your own conclusion(s).



    By the way,

    *. RIP 'Labor Substitution'. Thank God it is gone. Good riddance. Rules of game just got a lot fairer !!




    sanagani
    03-08 02:54 PM
    Appreciate your answer,,thank you



    No comments:

    Post a Comment